A better PL-259?

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

A better PL-259?

Rob_Walker
Member VE3RWY

Posts: 65
Threads: 6
Likes Received: 19 in 10 posts
Likes Given: 37
Joined: Apr 2020
Reputation: 97

#7

2022-03-19, 19:07:55

(2022-03-19, 12:55:49)VE3WI Dave Wrote: My opinion IS an engineering study ;-)

73
Dave, VE3WI

Of course, I would not have thought otherwise Big Grin

Big Grin

IP Address: 173.32.104.57

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

A better PL-259? - by Dave_VE3WI - 2021-12-16, 20:51:33

RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-18, 17:29:53

RE: A better PL-259? - by Dave_VE3WI - 2022-03-18, 19:24:20

RE: A better PL-259? - by Richard VE3OZW - 2022-03-19, 07:31:46

RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-19, 08:03:47

RE: A better PL-259? - by Dave_VE3WI - 2022-03-19, 12:55:49

RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-19, 19:07:55

RE: A better PL-259? - by Dave_VE3WI - 2022-03-22, 13:26:29

RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-22, 20:16:44

RE: A better PL-259? - by Dave_VE3WI - 2022-03-23, 10:51:11

RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-23, 19:29:31

RE: A better PL-259? - by Dave_VE3WI - 2022-03-24, 07:16:07

RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-24, 07:36:39

RE: A better PL-259? - by Dave_VE3WI - 2022-03-24, 11:52:14

RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-03-24, 12:13:56

RE: A better PL-259? - by Dave_VE3WI - 2022-03-24, 21:13:31

RE: A better PL-259? - by Rob_Walker - 2022-04-23, 23:04:08

View a Printable Version

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)