Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

ISED Proposes Major Changes to Antenna Tower Policy
#1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CppsKhx-CEc

Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) has opened a consultation (DGSO-001-26) on sweeping changes to its antenna tower siting process — changes that could meaningfully reshape how Canadian amateur radio operators install and maintain their stations. I recently sat down with Dave Goodwin, VE3KG, Regulatory Affairs Officer for Radio Amateurs of Canada (RAC), to unpack what's on the table and what it means for hams from coast to coast.

The Current Landscape
As Dave explained, ISED holds federal jurisdiction over antenna structures in Canada. Under the existing framework, proponents — including amateurs — are generally expected to consult with their Local Land Use Authority (LUA) and neighbours within a radius of three times the proposed tower's height. Importantly, structures 15 metres or shorter are exempt from this consultation process, a threshold that has long given many amateurs the flexibility to erect modest towers without bureaucratic hurdles.


What ISED Is Proposing
ISED is seeking feedback on 11 questions aimed at modernizing and streamlining the tower siting process. The major proposals include:
A new online portal replacing the current paper-based notification system.
Shrinking the consultation zone from three times to two times the tower height.
A physical sign requirement displaying a QR code at the proposed site — although ISED is also floating the alternative of delivering letters directly to neighbours, which would avoid drawing unnecessary public attention to a private installation.
Narrowing LUA objection grounds to only matters of consultation process, notification process, or safety.
A 45-day deadline for LUAs to concur; if they don't respond, the proposal is deemed approved.


The Amateur Radio Position
Dave was clear that RAC, along with Radio Amateurs du Québec (RAQI), is advocating for two key amateur-specific positions in its response:
Raising the height exemption from 15 m to 20 m. This modest increase would meaningfully expand the practical antenna options available to amateurs without triggering the full consultation process — particularly important for HF operators needing height for effective propagation.


Addressing private restrictions on antennas. RAC is pushing ISED to take a stand on restrictive covenants, condominium rules, and rental restrictions that currently prevent many amateurs — especially those in newer subdivisions, condos, and apartments — from erecting any antennas at all. This is a long-standing pain point in the Canadian amateur community, and the consultation is a rare opportunity to put it on the federal agenda.


Call to Action: Comments Due July 16


Dave emphasized that this consultation is one of the most important opportunities Canadian amateurs have had in years to influence federal antenna policy. Hams are strongly encouraged to:
Submit their own comments, or endorse the RAC/RAQI position in their submission.
All submissions should reference consultation number DGSO-001-26, and the deadline is July 16, 2026.


The full consultation document is available on the ISED website at
https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/spec...
As Dave put it, regulators count submissions — and silence from the amateur community could mean our interests get lost among those of commercial carriers. If you've ever struggled with a tower approval, a condo board, or a restrictive covenant, now is the time to make your voice heard.
73, and get those comments in.


#ISEDConsultation, #AntennaRules, #HamRadioCanada
Reply
#2

Thanks for posting.  Yes everyone should make a submission to ISED, even if you only send a one liner expressing support for RAC's position.

ISED's direction here is a bit of a breath of fresh air IMHO.  

Now if they would just get off the pot and issue the revised Advanced question bank - it's been more than a year since we submitted the draft  Angry

73
Dave, VE3WI
Reply
#3

https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/spectru...-reporting

3. All submissions should cite the Canada Gazette, Part I, the publication date, the title and the notice reference number (DGSO-001-26). Parties should submit their comments no later than July 16, 2026, to ensure consideration. Soon after the close of the comment period, all comments received will be posted on ISED's Spectrum Management and Telecommunications website.
74. ISED will also provide interested parties with the opportunity to reply to comments from other parties. Reply comments will be accepted until August 25, 2026.
75. Respondents are requested to provide their comments in electronic format (Microsoft Word or Adobe PDF) by email.
76. Paper submissions should be mailed to the following address:
  • Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
    Senior Director, Spectrum Operations Directorate, Spectrum Management Operations Branch
    235 Queen Street (6th Floor, East Tower)
    Ottawa ON   K1A 0H5

77. As all comments will be posted on the departmental website, those making submissions are responsible for ensuring that they do not contain confidential or private information.


Send comments to   spectrumoperations-operationsduspectre@ised-isde.gc.ca
Reply
#4

This is a summary and the webpage it came from

https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/spectru...-reporting

Q1

ISED is seeking comments on its proposal to remove the requirement of providing paper notification packages and replacing it with an online portal contemplated as set out above.

Q2

ISED is seeking comments as to whether 30 days following notification is an appropriate timeframe for the public to communicate any reasonable and relevant concerns to a proponent regarding a proposed tower.

Q3

ISED is seeking comments on the above list and any additional questions proponents should be required to answer in the online portal.

Q4

ISED is seeking comments on its proposal to require proponents to address only the concerns of those inhabiting within a radius of three times the height of the proposed tower.

Q5

ISED is seeking comments on its proposal to require proponents to include physical signage on the site of the proposed antenna tower and the information that should be contained on the signage.


Q6

ISED is seeking comments on its proposal to remove the requirement for tower proponents to place a notification in the local community newspaper for tower proposals.

Q7

ISED is seeking comments on what concerns it should consider valid for an LUA to raise in support of its non-concurrence and which of those concerns proponents can be reasonably expected to accommodate.

Q8

ISED is seeking comments on its proposal to establish a 45 calendar day timeframe for LUA concurrence.

Sample Letter

TO:
 Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
Spectrum Management Operations Branch
Senior Director
6th Floor, East Tower
235 Queen Street
Ottawa Ontario K1A 0H5
spectrumoperations-operationsduspectre@ised-isde.gc.ca
 
FROM:
 
(Your full name and address)
 
(date) June 2026
 
RE: Canada Gazette, Part I, 11 May 2026 - Consultation on Amendments to the Tower Siting Process
 (DGSO-001-26)
 
I am writing in support of the comments of the Radio Amateurs of Canada (RAC) and the Fédération des clubs radioamateurs du Québec (RAQI), which were submitted on 15 June 2026.
 
In particular, I wish to express my support for RAC and RAQI’s position on:
 
-           the height for exemption from consultation from 15 metres to 20 metres
 
-          A decrease in the size of the zone within which Amateurs are required to respond to their neighbours concerns.  RAC and RAQI have requested a decrease to two times the height of the antenna system from the current three times the height.
 
-          Adding language to CPC-2-0-03 to provide Radio Amateurs with relief from antenna restrictions in covenants on residential property
 
-          Requiring condominiums, stratas and rental housing to reasonably accommodate antennas for Radio Amateurs.
 
Thank you,
 
 
(your name)
(your email address)
Reply
#5

I sent mine
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)